🌐 ENFR
🌐 ENFR

Governance

Structured governance framework ensuring scientific integrity, ethical compliance, and transparent decision-making

Overview

WeCASOR operates under a structured governance framework designed to ensure scientific integrity, ethical compliance, operational transparency, and accountable decision-making across participating institutions.

The network functions as collaborative research infrastructure. Participating institutions remain legally independent and retain local regulatory authority.

Administrative coordination support is provided by PillarCore Research & Innovation (Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA).

Governance Structure

Program Director

Strategic oversight and external representation

Country Coordinators

Regional coordination and alignment

Site Principal Investigators

Local leadership and compliance

Scientific Advisory Board

Independent scientific guidance

Data Governance Committee

Data stewardship and compliance oversight

Publications Committee

Authorship and dissemination oversight

Decision‑Making Model

Governance decisions follow evidence-based evaluation, ethical compliance, conflict-of-interest disclosure, and transparent documentation.

Major policy changes and publication disputes are escalated through defined governance review pathways.

Authorship & Scientific Integrity

Authorship Standards

  • Authorship follows ICMJE criteria
  • Contributions are documented
  • Honorary authorship is not permitted
  • All authors approve final manuscript versions
  • Authors accept accountability for published content

Scientific Integrity

WeCASOR is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scientific integrity throughout the research process.

All research activities are conducted in accordance with international research standards and ethical guidelines.

Conflict of Interest

All governance members and investigators disclose potential conflicts of interest.

Disclosures are reviewed during major decisions and prior to publication.

Policy Review & Updates

Governance policies are reviewed periodically to align with evolving international research standards and network expansion.

Transparency Commitment

WeCASOR is committed to transparent governance, clear publication standards, responsible data stewardship, and annual reporting of activities.

Transparent governance documentation
Clear publication standards
Responsible data stewardship
Annual reporting of activities
Structured expansion framework
Documented institutional onboarding
WeCASOR
operates under a structured governance framework designed to ensure scientific integrity, ethical compliance, operational transparency, and accountable decision-making across participating institutions. The network functions as collaborative research infrastructure. Participating institutions remain legally independent and retain local regulatory authority. Administrative coordination support is provided by PillarCore Research & Innovation.
Organizational Structure

Program Director

Strategic oversight and external representation.

Country Coordinators

Regional coordination and alignment within participating nations.

Site Principal Investigators

Local leadership, ethical compliance, and data accuracy at the hospital level.

Scientific Advisory Board

Independent scientific guidance and methodological review.

Data Governance Committee

Data stewardship, security policy, and compliance oversight.

Publications Committee

Authorship integrity and dissemination oversight.

Policy & Governance Documents

DSMB Charter

Safety and data monitoring protocols.

Formal Risk Register

Network risk identification and mitigation.

Transparency & Reporting

Audits, governance KPIs and financial integrity.

Authorship & Scientific Integrity

WeCASOR maintains strict publication protocols to ensure that all participating sites receive appropriate credit for their data. We strictly adhere to ICMJE authorship criteria (Substantial contribution, drafting/revising, final approval, and accountability).

Scientific integrity is ensured through centralized data quality modules, regular cross-site validation, and a commitment to transparent reporting of all outcomes—positive or negative.

Conflict of Interest

All governance members and investigators disclose potential conflicts of interest. Disclosures are reviewed during major decisions and prior to publication.

Governance decisions follow evidence-based evaluation and transparent documentation.